Nurtureshock : new thinking about children
(Book)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Contributors
Published
New York : Twelve, [2009].
Edition
First edition.
ISBN
9780446504126, 0446504122
Physical Desc
xi, 336 pages ; 24 cm
Status
Adult Nonfiction (3rd floor)
NF 305.231 BRONSON 2009
1 available

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
Adult Nonfiction (3rd floor)NF 305.231 BRONSON 2009On Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Published
New York : Twelve, [2009].
Format
Book
Edition
First edition.
Language
English
ISBN
9780446504126, 0446504122

Notes

Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description
Demonstrate that many of modern society's strategies for nurturing children are in fact backfiring--because key twists in the science of child development have been overlooked. The authors discuss the inverse power of praise, why insufficient sleep adversely affects kids' capacity to learn, why white parents don't talk about race, why kids lie, why evaluation methods for "giftedness" and accompanying programs don't work, and why siblings really fight.

Reviews from GoodReads

Loading GoodReads Reviews.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2009). Nurtureshock: new thinking about children (First edition.). Twelve.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Bronson, Po, 1964- and Ashley. Merryman. 2009. Nurtureshock: New Thinking About Children. Twelve.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Bronson, Po, 1964- and Ashley. Merryman. Nurtureshock: New Thinking About Children Twelve, 2009.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Bronson, Po, and Ashley Merryman. Nurtureshock: New Thinking About Children First edition., Twelve, 2009.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.